Article written by By eWASA Team (EPR Waste Association of South Africa)

Using more recycled materials – making food and drinks packaging from recycled plastic wherever possible. This increases the demand for recycled plastics and makes recycling more economically viable.

What Impact Could a Project Like This Have?

In 2022, the CSIR conducted a scientific analysis to estimate how much plastic waste gets leaked into the environment in South Africa. The researchers used a method called the “Pathways Tool” to project plastic pollution figures for the future. They discovered that without any environmental interventions, plastic pollution in our country will likely double from 2020 to 2040.

Then, they studied the effects of EPR. If we meet the recycling targets set out in the extended producer responsibility laws, South Africa will be able to reduce plastic pollution by 33%. Unfortunately, this is not enough. When you consider that we use more and more plastic every year, meeting EPR goals will only stabilise pollution at its current level.

Finally, the CSIR team studied what would happen if we made a total system change, such as the one proposed by the GEF’s five-year project. The results by 2040 could be extraordinary:

Reduce plastic pollution by 63%
Reduce greenhouse gases by 37%
Reduce investment requirements by 67%
Increase job opportunities by 3%

Protecting Jobs in the Plastics Industry

Despite the pollution plastic can cause, it also creates millions of jobs. Many people are worried that changing the plastic industry too much could have negative side effects for the economy. Thankfully, protecting livelihoods is part of the GEF’s five-year project for South Africa.

Last year, the WWF commissioned a scientific report that looks at the socio-economic impacts of eliminating certain plastics from our economy. The report found that gradually phasing out plastic fruit/bread bags, lollipop sticks, takeaway containers, sauce sachets, single-use cutlery, and plastic-stemmed cotton buds would actually have a positive effect on the economy.

Phasing these products out by 2030 would force us to innovate and find replacements, increasing South Africa’s real GDP by 3%. This strategy could also increase employment by 5% and boost wages by 10%. The study also found that none of these products are currently collected by waste pickers, so their livelihoods would be protected.

The Future is Looking Good

All the research seems to say the same thing: ending plastic pollution will be a combined effort. It’s a complex problem that affects not only the environment, but the economy, human health, and the very ways we live our lives. The Global Environment Fund, WWF, and UNIDO understand this complexity and have proposed a five-year project with collaboration in mind.

As the research shows, extended producer responsibility is not the be-all-and-end-all, but at least it brings the private sector to the table. Almost all businesses are affected by plastic regulations, and this project allows them to get involved in decision-making. By working together, we can make clean parks, beaches, rivers, and oceans a reality while growing the economy and creating jobs.

Join a producer responsibility organisation today – chat with us for more information.

Picture: Richfield Plastics

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *